GOODY TWO SHOES: It’s Not News If It Happens To A Journalist

 

WBBM-Channel 2 (Chicago) anchor Diann Burns is involved in a messy lawsuit against Metzler-Hull Development Co., accusing the firm of doing slapdash work on her $3 million home because she is black. For its part, the firm accuses Burns and her husband of bringing race into a run-of-the-mill contract dispute to “destroy” its business, and has filed a countersuit asking for $1 million in damages.

 

Sounds like a juicy story, right? Burns must think so, because she is doing everything she can think of to keep the press at bay: Imposing a news blackout at her TV station; petitioning  a Cook County judge to seal the case; and filing court documents requesting that “all attorneys, experts and court personnel involved” sign an agreement prohibiting them from talking about the case or selling photos of the home’s interior” for five years after the matter is adjudicated, the Chicago Sun-Times reports. Otherwise, Burns and her husband “will suffer unreasonable annoyance and embarrassment” and will be deprived of “the privacy and peace of the home to which every human being is entitled.”

 

No journalist – especially one chasing a major scoop on deadline – believes any human being is entitled to privacy. When the MSM decides that “the public has the right to know,” all other rights – and all others’ rights - are trumped by the First Amendment.

 

The Stiletto would like to know whether this newly-acquired sensitivity to privacy concerns evinced by Burns - the city's highest-paid news anchor – will affect news coverage across the board at WBBM.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.