Welcome to The Stiletto Blog, a current events blog for conservatives that is at the nexus between cut-throat politics and high-end footwear. Plus, stuff that makes The Stiletto
laugh so hard the martini she’s sipping comes out her nose.
You Won't Do Nothing As She Keeps On Cutting 'Cause You Know You Love The Knife
You've noticed that, like Bob Dole, The Stiletto refers to herself in the third person. No reason, other than it seems to annoy liberals.
The Stiletto is a news junkie (not in the Jason Leopold sense, mind you), and spends what free
time she has speed-reading through several RSS feeds, online editions of dozens of newspapers; AP, UPI and Reuters newswires; a passel of online news, business and tech magazines; plus various Web
sites and blogs devoted to political news and (mostly, but not exclusively, conservative) commentary.
The Stiletto enjoys thoughtful, well-researched, elegantly written exposition on the momentous issues of the day as much as the next person. But The Stiletto is a busy, busy girl and the next
person isn’t writing this blog, so she likes to get to the thrust of the matter in a few quick strokes. When The Stiletto goes in for the kill, her MO is to dip her blade in acid before plunging it
into her hapless victim: A snarky headline and/or incisive observation, and her work is done. In and out.
The Stiletto comes from a broken home. Not broken in the commonly understood sense, but broken in the red state-blue state sense.
Like many Americans, The Stiletto’s family is a mixed bag: Multicultural, multiracial, multiethnic, multinational, ecumenical, and includes members who are gay (in-laws, but still).
The Stiletto loves them all – albeit, at a distance in election years – so anyone who disagrees with her opinions had better refrain from recklessly lobbing accusations of racism, homophobia,
jingoism or imperialism.
Please send tips and story ideas (along with the permalink or the URL of the printer-friendly version, if available) to The Stiletto at:
thestiletto@thestiletto.info.
Here are examples of material in which The Stiletto is especially interested:
† Not The Sharpest Knife In The Drawer: Idiotic or irrational actions or utterances, by politicians, celebrities and everyday people.
† On The Cutting Edge: Fresh insight on contentious issues. Also, any cool techie thing that would appeal to The Stiletto's inner geek.
† The Daily Blade: News and current events, sharpened by a snarky, clever, punning or witty headline.
† Penetrating Insights: Common knowledge, typically delivered with breathless earnestness by celebs or self-help publications.
† What A Heel!: Cads, oafs and politicians behaving badly.
† Goody Two Shoes: Holier-than-thou, politically correct types admonishing the rest of us while exempting themselves from their own standards of conduct. Also, examples of media
hypocricy.
† If The Shoe Fits: Bone-headed, painfully obvious or overly specific advice on matters of health, wealth and life in general.
† In My Shoes: "Slice of life" stories. Also, how a particular event, issue, policy, vote, court decision, etc. affects a specific person or community.
Readers may come across a typo from time to time. The Stiletto is very appreciative when readers point out grammatical or spelling errors - as well as outdated links.
The Stiletto typically writes late at night, and may transpose letters in words or accidentally delete or duplicate a word or two when making quick edits by copying, cutting and pasting text. Alas, poofreading is not her strong suit.
Whenever typos, grammatical errors or outdated links are brought to The Stiletto's attention, she endeavors to make the necessary changes as soon as possible.
If the nature of the error is factual, she will note that a corrective revision has been made and will cite the reason in an Editorial Note following the post.
Submitting a comment doesn’t guarantee that it will be, or remain, posted. To increase your chances of comments being posted on The Stiletto Blog, please follow these simple rules.
Is This One Of Those Jobs That “Americans Won’t Do?” Part I: August 1, 2006 Part II: July 9,
2007 Part III: July 25, 2007 Part IV: December 21, 2007 (second item) Part V: January 2, 2008 (last
item) Part VI: March 10, 2008 (last item) Part VII: March 12, 2008 (last item) Part VIII: March 14, 2008 (fourth item) Part IX: June 16, 2008 (second item) Part X: August 15, 2008 (last
item) Part XI: December 22, 2008 (last item) Part XII: March 9,
2009 Part XIII: April 15, 2009 (third
item) Part XIV: March 10, 2010 (last
item)
Is Obama Already A Lame Duck? Part I: August 17,
2009 Part II: August 24, 2009 (second item) Part III: August, 26 2009 (second item) Part IV: August 28, 2009 (third item) Part V: September 2, 2009 (third item) Part VI: September 9, 2009 (fifth item) Part VII: September 11, 2009 Part VIII: September 16, 2009 (second item) Part IX: September 21, 2009 (third item) Part X: September 23, 2009 (eighth item) Part XI: September 30, 2009 Part XII: October 2, 2009 (second item) Part XIII: October 5, 2009 (second item) Part XIV: October 7, 2009 (second item) Part XV: October 9, 2009 Part XVI: October 21, 2009 Part XVII: October 23, 2009 (third item) Part XVIII: October 26, 2009 (sixth item) Part XVIX: November 6, 2009 (second item) Part XX: November 18, 2009 Part XXI: November 20, 2009 Part XXII: November 30, 2009 Part XXIII: December 7, 2009 Part XXIV: December 21, 2009 (fifth item) Part XXV: December 23, 2009 (seventh item) Part XXVI: December 28, 2009 (third item) Part XXVII: December 30, 2009 (fifth item) Part XXVIII: January 13, 2010 (third item) Part XXVIX: January 22, 2010 Part XXX: January 27, 2010 Part XXXI: January 29, 2010 Part XXXII: February 8, 2010 (second item) Part XXXIII: February 10, 2010 Part XXXIV: March 8, 2010 (seventh item) Part XXXV: March 22, 2010 Part XXXVI: March 31, 2010 (third item) Part XXXVII: April 14, 2010 Part XXXVIII: April 19, 2010 (third item) Part XXXIX: April 23, 2010 Part XL: May 7, 2010 Part XLI: May 10, 2010 (third item) Part XLII: May 19, 2010 (second item) Part XLIII: May 24, 2010 (fifth item) Part XLIV: May 28, 2010 Part XLV: June 2, 2010 Part XLVI: June 4, 2010 Part XLVII: June 18, 2010 (second item) Part XLVIII: July 14, 2010 Part XLIX: July 28, 2010 Part L: August 8, 2010 Part LI: August 20, 2010 (fourth item) Part LII: September 17, 2010 (second item) Part LIII: September 22, 2010 (second item) Part LIV: October 4, 2010 (first item) Part LV: October 13, 2010 (eighth item) Part LVI: October 25, 2010 (fifth item) Part LVII: November 5, 2010 (second item) Part LVIII: November 8, 2010 (ninth item) Part LIX: November 10, 2010 (third item) Part LX: November 12, 2010 (second item) Part LXI: November 22, 2010 (fifth item) Part LXII: December 3, 2010 (first item) Part LXII: December 8, 2010 (first item)
The Definition Of Chutzpah Part I: January 16, 2008 (second item) Part II: November 19, 2008 Part III: November 21, 2008 Part IV: December 1, 2008 Part V : December 8, 2008 Part VI: December 12, 2008 Part VII: February 13, 2009 (second item) Part VIII: December
18, 2009 Part IX: May 24, 2010 (last item) Part X: August 2,
2010 (second item) Part
XI: August 4, 2010 (second item) Part XII: August 25, 2010 (last item) Part XIII: September 22, 2010 (last item)
We Fight Them Over There So We Don’t Have To Fight Them Over Here? Part
I : September 11, 2006 Part
II : February 21, 2007 (second item) Part
III : September 5, 2007 (last item) Part
IV : October 21, 2009 (third item) Part
V : December 7, 2009 (second item) Part
VI : December 16, 2009 (second item) Part
VII : March 26, 2010 (last item) Part
VIII : May 26, 2010 (last item) Part
IX : June 4, 2010 (third item) Part
X : June 4, 2010 (third item) Part
XI : June 7, 2010 (second item) Part
XII : July 14, 2010 (first item) Part
XIII : July 26, 2010 (second item) Part
XIV : August 4, 2010 (first item) Part
XV : October 25, 2010 (first item) Part
XVI : October 27, 2010 (last item) Part
XVII : October 30, 2010 (second item)
10 Reasons Michelle Obama Should Be Proud – Really Proud – Of America (Actually, 20 Reasons) 1-11: February 22, 2008 12: November 24, 2008 13: December 1, 2008 (third item) 14: December 5, 2008 (fourth item) 15: December 8, 2008 (third item) 16: December 15, 2008 (fourth item) 17: December 24, 2008 (second item) 18: January 19, 2009 (last item) 19: February 2, 2009 (fourth item) 20: February 6, 2009 (last item)
(Um, Reasons 21-30) 21: February 20, 2009 (last item) 22: March 9, 2009 (fourth item) 23: March 23, 2009 (last item) 24: April 6, 2009 (last item) 25: April 27, 2009 (last item) 26: May 29, 2009 (last item) 27: June 1, 2009 (last item) 28: June 3, 2009 (last item) 29: June 5, 2009 (last item) 30: June 8, 2009 (last item)
(Reasons 31-40) 31: June 24, 2009 (last item) 32: June 29, 2009 (last item) 33: July 6, 2009 (last item) 34: July 8, 2009 (last item) 35: July 13, 2009 (last item) 36: August 24, 2009 (last item) 37: November 16, 2009 (last item) 38: November 18, 2009 (last item) 39: December 4, 2009 (last item) 40: December 11, 2009 (last item)
(Reasons 41-50) 41: December 14, 2009 (last item) 42: December 16, 2009 (last item) 43: December 18, 2009 (last item) 44: December 21, 2009 (last item) 45: December 23, 2009 (last item) 46: December 28, 2009 (last item) 47: December 30, 2009 (last item) 48: January 4, 2010 (last item) 49: January 6, 2010 (last item) 50: January 13, 2010 (last item)
(Reasons 51-60) 51: January 18, 2010 (last item) 52: January 25, 2010 (last item) 53: January 27, 2010 (last item) 54: February 3, 2010 (last item) 55: February 5, 2010 (last item) 56: February 12, 2010 (last item) 57: February 22, 2010 (last item) 58: February 24, 2010 (last item) 59: February 26, 2010 (last item) 60: March 3, 2010 (last item)
(Reasons 61-70) 61: March 8, 2010 (last item) 62: March 10, 2010 (last item) 63: March 15, 2010 (last item) 64: March 17, 2010 (last item) 65: March 22, 2010 (last item) 66: March 26, 2010 (last item) 67: April 9, 2010 (last item) 68: April 14, 2010 (last item) 69: April 19, 2010 (last item) 70: April 21, 2010 (last item)
(Reasons 71-80) 71: April 23, 2010 (last item) 72: April 26, 2010 (last item) 73: May 5, 2010 (last item) 74: May 7, 2010 (last item) 75: May 10, 2010 (last item) 76: May 12, 2010 (last item) 77: June 2, 2010 (last item) 78: June 7, 2010 (last item) 79: June 9, 2010 (last item) 80: June 16, 2010 (last item)
(Reasons 81-90) 81: June 21, 2010 (last item) 82: June 24, 2010 (last item) 83: July 19, 2010 (last item) 84: July 21, 2010 (last item) 85: August 9, 2010 (last item) 86: August 13, 2010 (last item) 87: September 8, 2010 (last item) 88: September 17, 2010 (last item) 89: September 20, 2010 (last item) 90: October 6, 2010 (last item)
(Reasons 91-99) 91: October 8, 2010 (last item) 92: November 25, 2010 (last item) 93: November 29, 2010 (last item) 94: December 3, 2010 (last item) 95: December 27, 2010 (last item) 96: December 29, 2010 (last item)
The Stiletto: THE DAILY BLADE: Look Who Has The Audacity To Lecture The USA On “Collective Conscience”
THE DAILY BLADE: Look Who Has The Audacity To Lecture The USA On “Collective Conscience”
The Washington Post published an op-ed piece today by Abdullah Gul, foreign minister and deputy prime minister of Turkey, that was stunningly ironic given Turkey’s 90-year history of genocide denial:
The grave tragedy that has been unfolding before our eyes in Lebanon, and the inability of the international community to bring it to an end after three weeks of suffering, unfortunately raise questions about the United States and its proud legacy of leadership for freedom and justice. …
millions around the world watch in complete horror as events unfold in Lebanon. …
Today live images of the carnage and destruction are broadcast directly into our households. …
Substitute “Turkey” for “Israel” and “Armenians” for “Lebanese,” and the bold-faced phrases would be a dead-on description of the 1915 massacres of more than 1.5 million men, women and children – a methodical extermination of nearly half of all the Armenians in the entire world at the time. The word “genocide” was, in fact, coined in the aftermath of the Armenian massacres to describe the near-annihilation of an entire race.
The only difference is that, in 1915 people only had written accounts of the rapes and murders – cables from US diplomats, letters from missionaries, articles and photographs by journalists on the scene – and not real-time video. Still, the horror was conveyed with enough vividness that even today, people around the world remember the Armenian massacres and resist Turkey’s ongoing attempts to whitewash this particularly bloody chapter of its history.
Which made The Stiletto choke on Gul’s gall when he appealed to “[retain] the higher moral ground” and called “for all of us to act upon … our collective conscience.”
Why doesn’t Turkey show the same leadership Gul is calling on America to demonstrate by acting on its collective conscience finally to admit the crime against humanity perpetrated by the Ottomans?
Instead, Turkeyprosecutes its own citizens (video) who dare question the government’s official position of genocide denial. In a May 16 editorial, “Turkey, Armenia and Denial” (now archived), The New York Times notes that genocide denial has become a “self destructive obsession,” given Turkey’s ardent desire to join the European Union:
Turkey's self-destructive obsession with denying the Armenian genocide seems to have no limits. The Turks pulled out of a NATO exercise this week because the Canadian prime minister used the term "genocide" in reference to the mass killings of Armenians in Turkey during and after World War I. Before that, the Turkish ambassador to France was temporarily recalled to protest a French bill that would make it illegal to deny that the Armenian genocide occurred. …
Each time the Turks lash out, new questions arise about Turkey's claim to a place in the European Union, and the Armenian diaspora becomes even more adamant in demanding a public reckoning over what happened. …
But the Turkish government considers even discussion of the issue to be a grave national insult, and reacts to it with hysteria.…
The preponderance of serious scholarship outside Turkey accepts that more than a million Armenians perished between 1914 and 1923 in a regime-sponsored campaign.
Perhaps it’s asking too much of Turkey – which is becoming more Islamist and less secular by the day – to show leadership on this issue. But what about plain human decency? Until Turkey abandons its untenable position on the Armenian genocide, it lacks the moral standing to lecture the USA on its foreign policy and on its global role as a superpower.
Mediaweek Article, Air America Press Statement Separated At Birth?
Instead of doing its own reporting, trade magazine Mediaweek seems to have mistakenly rewritten this press release by liberal talk radio network Air America announcing its switch from WLIB-AM to WWRL-AM in New York City.
Headlined “Air America Gets New NYC Flagship,” the lede of the Mediaweek “article” made it appear as though the station switch was Air America’s idea:
“Air America has lined up a new New Yorkflagship radio station for its politically liberal talk radio network.”
Here’s how the press release put it:
“WWRL will become the flagship station for the Air America Radio network.”
The Mediaweek “article” included this upbeat quote from a top-ranking network executive:
“We are excited about our new affiliation and the platform this move will establish for Air America in the years ahead,” said JimWiggett, acting CEO of Air America.
The press release included this upbeat quote from Wiggett:
“We are excited about our new affiliation and the platform this move will establish for Air America in the years ahead.”
AlFranken and his lefty colleagues are leaving WLIB (1190 AM) apparently because they couldn't come up with enough cash for the owners, former Manhattan Borough President PercySutton and his son, Pierre.
Starting Sept. 1, Air America will be on WWRL, at the top of the dial where AM signals are weakest - especially at night, when greater FCC restrictions apply. …
Relations between the Suttons and the network's execs were rocky from the start and only got worse after the network's shaky finances became known and a scandal broke out involving loans to Air America from a Bronx charity.
The story has a somewhat different flavor when the Post tells it, doesn’t it? The Stiletto can only guess that they round filed the press release when it came in and wrote, um, an original story.
How To Tell Whether Your Senator Has Been In Washington Too Long
It seems that some senators are hot and bothered over visitors to the Capitol (otherwise known as “constituents” and “voters”) using “their” elevator.
FrankLautenberg (D-NJ) complains that, “Sometimes you have to shove your way through, push people,” according to The New York Times. “At times,” the paper reports, “senators even find themselves on public elevators, an ordeal fraught with the possibility of having to push their own buttons.” The senators-only elevators, which are supposed to enable rapid access to the Senate floor for votes, usually have attendants to do the button pushing.
It’s not the unwashed masses that bother RickSantorum (R-PA) as much as the (probably also unwashed) reporters cramming themselves onto the senators only conveyances. When HillaryClinton (D-NY) boarded an elevator with 10 reporters in tow, Santorum groused: “some of the rest of us need to get on board, too.” The Times reports that, “he eventually squeezed in.”
Update:
The Associated Presscorrected its July 26 article on heterosexuals complaining of “straight bashing” in the quaint gay resort village of Provincetown, RI:
The Associated Press erroneously reported the number of Massachusetts residents listed by knowthyneighbor.org as having signed a petition in support of a constitutional ban on gay marriage. The Web site published more than 148,000 names and addresses of those who signed, not 5,000.
See, this just goes to the point The Stiletto made yesterday in The Daily Blade post (third item), “Why Is This An Either Or Proposition?,” about journalists not being good with numbers.
By the way, The Stiletto’s July 21 comment on this tactic, “Gays Use Same Playbook As Eco-Terrorists,” was based on a Reuters report that did not mention the number of people whose names were publicized on the Web site.
Comments