THE DAILY BLADE: Does The ACLU Consider This A “Separation Of Church And State” Issue?: Part II


Elvira Arellano, an illegal immigrant who had been given "sanctuary" at the Adalberto United Methodist Church in the Humboldt Park section of Chicago for a year slipped out the back door and headed to Los Angeles to participate in an immigration march. At the last minute, though, she bagged the march and holed up in Our Lady Queen of Angels Church (AKA Iglesia Nuestra Señora Reina de los Angeles and La Placita Church) – where she held several press conferences attended by reporters who almost universally refer to her as an "immigrant activist."

Arellano must have been disappointed that fewer than 500 demonstrators showed up to witness her martyrdom and no doubt decided to wait for a more high-profile event from which to be dragged off in manacles by jackbooted immigration agents. She’ll likely go back to Plan A, which is to travel to Washington, D.C. to pray and fast at the National Mall on Sept. 12 in hopes of pressuring Congress to enact immigration reform that will allow her to trade "sanctuary" for amnesty.

Arellano illegally entered WA in 1997 and was deported to Mexico soon after, only to sneak across the border again. She moved to IL in 2000, and began working at O‘Hare International Airport cleaning planes (using a fake Social Security number to get the job, of course).

Radio talk show host Mike Gallagher gives us his take on the Rev. Walter Coleman, the misguided – and limelight-seeking – pastor who sheltered her for a year:

[I]nterviewing this guy on the radio is an exercise in futility. I’d ask him a question about when his little tenant plans to depart her holy digs and he’d ramble on about how illegals only work the jobs that Americans refuse to work, how hard illegals work, blah, blah, blah.

In other words, Elvira was the perfect vehicle for a Methodist minister who was just aching to make his mark in the pro-illegal movement. …

She’s enjoyed a year of "sanctuary" because she found some misguided church pastor who decided to claim his fifteen minutes of fame by harboring a fugitive.

Last year, Gail Montenegro, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) spokesperson in Chicago, told The Washington Post that, "ICE has the authority to arrest anyone in violation of immigration law anywhere in the U.S" – even a church.

The Apostle Paul advised, "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from G-d, and those that exist have been instituted by G-d. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what G-d has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment." [Romans 13:1 and 13:2]

Clearly, under both Caesar’s law and G-d’s law (second item), Rev. Coleman had no justification to aid and abet Arellano’s lawbreaking, and federal immigration officers were free to enter the church and arrest her at will.

So why didn’t they? Because Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff lacks the will.

According to the Chicago Tribune, "with worldwide publicity surrounding her case, officials have avoided the symbolism of raiding a church, referring anyone who asks about their intentions to a prepared statement that calls Arellano a fugitive and explains that all arrests are prioritized."

What does Chertoff mean by "prioritized?" This is what he told attendees at the at the Fourth Annual Border Security Conference last week at the University of Texas (El Paso):

"We’re faced with a system where our customs and immigration officers are saddled with the need to pursue people who are coming here to work, which distracts them from pursuing those who are coming to do harm."

Since we do not know who is coming into or leaving our country, and do not track – and therefore do not know - where they go once they’re inside our borders, how can we assume that they are all here "to work." How do we know whether a particular illegal alien isn’t here to further the reach of criminal enterprises, such as MS-13 or Mexican drug cartels – which have ties to Al-Qaeda?

The truth is, we have no idea who is "coming do harm" and cannot pursue them until after they have done harm."

Chicago Tribune metro columnist Eric Zorn argues that the government’s inaction validated "an idea that's unconstitutional and potentially dangerous - that she was somehow safe from the law inside the four walls of a church." He adds that the government "had their chance [to arrest her]. For whatever reason, they passed. Game over. She won. Move on."

But that’s not how Gallagher sees it:

She’s enjoyed a year of "sanctuary" because she found some misguided church pastor who decided to claim his fifteen minutes of fame by harboring a fugitive. When she leaves the church, the sanctuary is gone. Over. Done. Off she should go to lock-up.

But that’s probably not the way this will play out, is it? Heck, in a perfect world, the pastor would be taken off to jail with her. If you or I gave aid and comfort to a fugitive from justice, the police wouldn’t think twice about arresting us.

Like the majority of Zorn’s readers, The Stiletto is in Gallagher’s camp: Better late than never. No federal, state or local statute enshrines the concept of "sanctuary" in a house of worship.

Arellano’s new "sanctuary" in LA is one of more than a dozen churches nationwide that have sheltered illegal immigrants who have been ordered to leave our country, reports the Chicago Tribune. Any illegal alien who pulls this stunt, and the cleric extending bogus "sanctuary" to him or her, ought to be arrested. And since flouting our laws and sheltering illegal aliens who have been ordered deported is a blatantly political act, these churches should lose their tax-exempt status.

This is the real world, not a Victor Hugo novel.

Editorial Note: Elvira Arellano was arrested Sunday evening, Eastern time. ICE released this statement: "Arellano, who was taken into custody without incident, is being processed for removal to Mexico based upon a deportation order originally issued by a federal immigration judge in 1997. Arresting and removing criminal aliens is one of ICE's top enforcement priorities and the agency will continue to pursue these cases vigorously." She has since been
deported to Tijuana. Mexico.

Gifted Children Left Behind (Literally)

Time magazine writer John Cloud introduces us to Annalisee Brasil, a 14-year old who lives in Longview, TX, and "has the looks of a South American model," is a "gifted singer" and has an IQ "comfortably above 145, placing the girl in the top 0.1% of the population." No public school was willing to do what it took to educate her - even though the solution would have cost nothing:

Annalisee's parents - Angi, a 53-year-old university assistant, and Marcelo, 63, who recently retired from his job at a Caterpillar dealership - couldn't find a school … even as far away as the Dallas area - willing to let Annalisee skip more than two grades. She needed to skip at least three - she was doing sixth-grade work at age 7. Many school systems are wary of grade skipping even though research shows that it usually works well both academically and socially for gifted students - and that holding them back can lead to isolation and underachievement. So Angi home schooled Annalisee. …

The system failed Annalisee, but could any system be designed to accommodate her rare gifts? Actually, it would have been fairly simple (and virtually cost-free) to let her skip grades, but … our education system has little idea how to cultivate its most promising students. Since well before the Bush Administration began using the impossibly sunny term "no child left behind," those who write education policy in the U.S. have worried most about kids at the bottom, stragglers of impoverished means or IQs.

[S]ince at least the mid-1980s, schools have often forced gifted students to stay in age-assigned grades - even though a 160-IQ kid trying to learn at the pace of average, 100-IQ kids is akin to an average girl trying to learn at the pace of a retarded girl with an IQ of 40. Advocates for gifted kids consider one of the most pernicious results to be "cooperative learning" arrangements in which high-ability students are paired with struggling kids on projects. [Emphasis, The Stiletto’s.]

Cloud notes that of the 62 million school-age kids in the U.S., roughly equal numbers have IQs above 145 and IQs below 55 (about 62,000 students in each group). "That's a small number, but they appear in every demographic, in every community." And yet American schools spend more 10 times as much on the retarded as on the gifted ($8 billion v. $800 million per year).

So not only public school systems aren’t allocating resources to educating our best and brightest, they are using gifted students as unpaid workers in place of hiring enough school aides to work with kids who need one-on-one attention.

When you have an educational system that utterly ignores the needs of gifted children, it’s not just their loss but ours. Notes Cloud; "Squandered potential is always unfortunate, but presumably it is these powerful young minds that, if nourished, could one day cure leukemia or stop global warming or become the next James Joyce - or at least J.K. Rowling."

Editorial Note:
From the ages of 6 to 16, The Stiletto read a book a day. By 10 years old, she had devoured nearly everything the Brontë sisters had written (Jane Eyre was a particular favorite, and she could recite certain passages verbatim), and had already discovered Thomas Hardy, Honoré de Balzac and Theodore Dreiser. Unfortunately, while her reading level was years ahead of her peers, she was only six months past grade level in math and was not skipped even one grade. By high school she couldn’t endure the soul-crushing boredom any longer, and applied her intellect to finding creative ways to cut class - attending only advanced placement English, history and science courses - without being marked "absent." For all intents and purposes, The Stiletto went straight from junior high to college, only without skipping any grades - and with a perfect attendance record!


Dems Do Des Moines

Like most voters, The Stiletto has gotten debate-weary by now. The same warmed-over scripted answers brought to the lectern over and over again, like a leftover tuna casserole that makes the roundtrip from the fridge to the microwave to the table over and over again.

Let’s face it, by now all we’re watching for is that flash of humor to savor, like a bit of truffle that has somehow found its way into the casserole, or the occasional misstep to chew on.

Here’s the truffle from yesterday’s Dem debate (transcript): Dennis Kucinich - who had earlier complained to moderator George Stephanopoulos that the debate questions weren’t being meted out equitably - was dead last in getting to answer a question put to the field on what to do about Iraq, and dead last again in responding to a question by a voter in UT on - of all things – the power of prayer. When his turn finally came, he quipped: "I have been standing here for the last 45 minutes praying you were going to call on me."

As it happens, Kucinich was also responsible for the most toothsome exchange of the debate, in The Stiletto’s opinion. A voter from AL had this question for all the candidates: "Can you name a major issue where you didn't tell the whole truth and describe what you left out?"

Like Edwards, who answered just before her, Hillary admitted to regretting her vote to authorize the Iraq war. Stephanopoulos tried to steer her back to the central premise of the question: "But did you tell the whole truth when discussing it?":

Clinton: Well, as I saw it, yes, you know, similar to John. You know, when the president of the United States says, as he said publicly, and then as people around him said privately over and over again, "We're going to use this authority to get inspectors back in, "We're going to go to the United Nations," you know, at some point, you do have to make that evaluation. And I thought that, based on what he had said and what we were talking about at the time in the Congress, that that would be an appropriate approach.

Kucinich: Were you tricked?

Clinton:
I would never have diverted our attention to Iraq, and I never would have pursued this war. I think that has been a terrible mistake for our country.

Kucinich:
Were you tricked, Senator Clinton?

Richardson rescued Hillary by recasting the question as being about "past regrets and mistakes," and making a lame joke that, "I'm making, at this rate, about one mistake a week."

Of course Hillary wasn’t "tricked." She just didn’t bother reading the National Intelligence Estimate report on Iraq before casting her vote.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • August 22, 2007 Qwerty the cucumber wrote:
    I was homeschooled as well; the community college's early-entrance program fit our needs splendidly. Great to see homeschoolers in the news!
    Reply to this
  • August 24, 2007 Susan Heller-Somerville wrote:
    I am a retired elementary school teacher. During my many years teaching Grades 1-6, I had numerous gifted children. I was constantly fighting "the system" to even half-way meet their needs.

    One 1st grade boy, who I used to send into the 6th grade to work on fractals, went on to 2nd grade and was made to do every page in the Math workbook. His stories showed grammatical useage at a higher level than most 5th graders, and of course his reading was at the 7th grade level. The other teachers did not provide for him. And this was a top notch school where many of the students' parents were associated with the University of California.

    I discovered very early in my career that I had to sabotage the educational system so that I could meet the demands of my students - high, low, and very average. I loved meeting the challenge, especially when I would see the glow in my students' eyes.

    In 1980-1981, I also had the privilege of teaching an gifted 5th and 6th grade class in a good school in Oakland. It was considered "an experiment," and could have set a marvelous example for numerous schools. However, many of the parents in that school deemed it unfair that there existed "an elitist class." I think that they had a point, but again, it was to the detriment of the children who were categorized as gifted.

    The GATE program, which existed in California for many years, was a "pull-out" program. I taught it on and off; and although it was far from what the gifted children needed, at least it was something. (It was mostly enrichment, though one year I attempted to make it more academic.) I think that the program was discontinued at some point, too.

    That brings up another issue. Pull-out programs do not work. The Resource Specialist Program, which pertains to children who are doing poorly at their respective grade levels, is also notorious for not being able to bring the students up to par. Interestingly enough, prior to 1980, 8 -12 students were in a special education class every single day, instead of leaving their regular class for 45-50 minutes a day. In the all day class, they had a teacher and teacher-aide, special desks which eliminated distractions, individualized programs, and a minimum of mainstreaming back into their respective regular classrooms. Those programs worked!

    I think that a complete overhaul is what is needed in the entire educational system, sans fads like Multicultural education, Ebonics, over-concentration on Handwriting and Phonics, and way too much emphasis on drill work in Math.

    Teachers need to take their political opinions out of the classroom too - at all levels.

    It all has to start with Teacher Education classes, with professors who do not treat their college students like first graders, and where real educational problems and issues are discussed, theory is taught in a more intellectual manner, and the practicum is made more worthwhile.

    All of this is a national imperative.
    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.