THE DAILY BLADE: How Poor Is Poor?


Poverty is in the eye of the beholder. It turns out that the poor in America have a higher standard of living than the average European.

Columnist Bill Steigerwald recently interviewed The Heritage Foundation’s Robert Rector, who is an expert on poverty and the economic and social costs of welfare, about the recent U.S. Census Bureau report that pegged the number of Americans the government considers "poor" at 37 million. This particular Q&A is a real eye-opener:

Q: John Edwards and others lament that 37 million Americans struggle with incredible poverty every day. You say it is not so simple or accurate to think of them as truly poor. What do you mean?

A:
Well, when John Edwards says that one in eight Americans do not have enough money for food, shelter or clothing, that’s generally what the average citizen is thinking about when they hear the word "poverty." But if that’s what we mean by poverty, then virtually none of these 37 million people that are ostensibly poor are actually poor. …

When you look at the people who John Edwards insists are poor, what you find is that the overwhelming majority of them have cable television, have air conditioning, have microwaves, have two color TVs; 45 percent of them own their own homes, which are typically three-bedroom homes with 1½ baths in very good recondition. On average, poor people who live in either apartments or in houses are not crowded and actually have more living space than the average person living in European countries, such as France, Italy or England.

Also, a lot of people believe that poor people are malnourished. But in fact when you look at the average nutriment intake of poor children, it is virtually indistinguishable from upper-middle-class children. … And the boys, when they reach 18, are a full one inch taller and 10 pounds heavier than the GIs storming the beaches of Normandy. It’s pretty hard to accomplish that if you are facing chronic food shortages throughout your life.

Looking at the Census Bureau report, The New York Post asks, "Exactly what is the best way to measure ‘poverty’?" The government’s definition of poverty is based solely on income – and omits any non-cash government assistance for food, healthcare and housing. Notes The Post: "Taking all federal, state and local means-tested programs together, national anti-poverty spending is nearly $600 billion a year." The paper adds:

New York's social-safety net is especially generous … [a] single-parent city household [typically, a mother and three kids] is eligible for means-tested assistance in approximately the following amounts:

Medicaid - $10,080

Child-care aid - $9,516

Earned income tax credit - $6,065 (combining federal, state and city sources)

Food stamps - $4,626

Child tax credit - $741

Heating aid - $ 360

Phone aid - $60

That is a total package of well over $30,000 in aid available to this family - again, none of it factored into the Census Bureau's definition of poverty.

In addition, many of the working poor are eligible for federally subsidized, locally distributed Section 8 housing vouchers - an additional value of some $9,200.

So there you have it: Without having to do a lick of work – meaning earning not a single red cent in income - a family of four in New York City gets a hair under $40,000 in aid programs. The median annual household income – meaning earnings from work and investments - was $48,201 in 2006, according to the Census Bureau.


Turkish MSM Even Less Trustworthy Than Ours

Given how Turkish newspapers "report" the news, "independent journalist" Alexis Debat would have no trouble landing a top spot at any one of them. For instance, during Pope Benedict's visit to Turkey last November, local papers quoted Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan as claiming that the pontiff told him, "You know we don’t have a political role, but we wish for Turkey’s entry into the EU" – which prompted a swift "clarification" by the Vatican that essentially boiled down to "as if."

In the latest example of great moments in Turkish journalism, here is a comparison of how the paper Hürriyet summarized a September 13th speech by R. Nicholas Burns, Under Secretary for Political Affairs to the Atlantic Council of the United States (ACUS) and what the third-highest ranking official at the U.S. Department of State actually said.

Hürriyet: Nicholas Burns … has said that Turkey-US relations have reached a "critical juncture."

Burns: "I am pleased to be back at the Atlantic Council to discuss what is one of the most critical relationships for America in the world today - the relationship between the United States and Turkey."

Editorial Note: Nowhere in his remarks, does Burns say that the relationship between the two countries has reached a "critical juncture"; he does say several times that the two countries have a critical relationship. "Critical juncture" suggests a crossroad, which in turn suggests a parting of the ways. No diplomat would use such language to an ally.

***

Hürriyet: "Turkey is critical for us, an indispensable ally, with her commitment to secular democracy. Prime Minister Erdogan and President Gül are reliable. They have kept promises they have made to us in the past. Turkey is an important portal for energy sources to reach Europe. We support Turkey’s accession to the European Union."

Burns: "The Turkish people have just concluded important, even historic elections. These elections demonstrated the strong health of Turkey's democracy, the most impressive in the Moslem world. The result was a decisive and Turkey can now expect a period of renewal and growth at home and responsibility and challenge in its foreign policy. The United States government looks forward to a very close relationship with President Abdullah Gül and Prime Minister Erdogan. President Bush and Secretary Rice respect both of these men. We have worked very well and productively with them in years past and know that will continue in the years to come. We would like to agree with the newly-elected Turkish leadership on a period in the coming months of high-level visits, discussions and joint commitment to face together the challenges of stability and peace in the Middle East." …

"Turkey is the gateway for exports of oil and natural gas from the Caspian region and Iraq to Europe. Building on our successful cooperation in the 1990's to develop the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline and the South Caucasus gas pipeline, we now seek to expand this critical energy infrastructure into a Southern Corridor to help our European allies - Greece, Italy and into Western Europe - create a free market for energy supplies in Europe. These efforts can also help Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan bolster their own independence by providing them access to European energy markets." …

"We are among the strongest supporters of Turkey's EU aspirations. We call on Europe's leaders to signal clearly and unambiguously that Turkey will have a voice in the European Union in the future."Editorial Note: Nowhere in his remarks does Burns say that Erdogan and Gül, specifically, have been reliable allies and kept their promises to the U.S. Rather in weeping, historic terms, he states that Turkey has been a dependable and important ally in a turbulent region dating back to the Truman Doctrine.

***

Hürriyet: "The energy agreement between Iran and Turkey bothered us. It is beneficial for both the US and Turkey to keep Iran, which supports the Taleban and wants to possess nuclear power, under control."

Burns:
"We have worked well together to support of the clear international consensus demanding that Iran cease its nuclear weapons development programs. Turkey has also proven to be strong partner in countering Iran's support for terrorists in the Middle East. But the United States and Turkey still need to work out some tactical differences in handling Iran. We understand that Iran is a neighbor of Turkey and key trading partner, which sends over a million tourists to Turkey each year. Turkey's recent conclusion of a memorandum on energy cooperation with Iran, however, is troubling. Now is not the time for business as usual with Iran. We urge all of our friends and allies, including Turkey, to not reward Iran by investing in its oil and gas sector, while Iran continues to defy the United Nations Security Council by continuing its nuclear research for a weapons capability."

Editorial Note:
Hürriyet toned Burns’ remarks down big time. This was the one and only clear criticism of Turkish policy Burns dared to utter in his speech, and it was all-but censored. Burns pussyfooted around every other sensitive topic – in some cases ignoring some very inconvenient facts. For instance, Burns talked about Turkey’s "160-year legacy of modernizing reform, as the most successful example in the world today of a secular democracy within a Muslim society that can inspire reformers in the greater Middle East and beyond." He did not mention how the Armenian Genocide and successive massacres of other Christian minorities during the Ottoman era left modern Turkey 99.8 percent Muslim, how converts from Islam are prosecuted and sometimes murdered, and the spate of murders of Catholic priests that have occurred over the past couple of years. If you are not Muslim, Turkey is neither secular nor a democracy.

***

Hürriyet: "The PKK is a terrorist organisation. Our good faith should not be underestimated. I hope that solid steps will be taken against the PKK within the next six months."

Burns: "[T]he United States condemns the PKK as a vicious terrorist group. We mourn the loss of innocent Turkish lives in these attacks. We remain fully committed to working with the Governments of Turkey and Iraq to counter PKK terrorists, who are headquartered in northern Iraq. We are making progress in putting in place the mechanisms required to produce such concrete results against the PKK. We will also follow up our success in working with Turkey and our other European partners to interdict PKK terror financiers in Europe and bring them to justice."

Editorial Note: Nowhere in his remarks does Burns mention a timetable.

***

Hürriyet:
"The Fener Greek Patriarchate is of ecumenical status. The US recognises Patriarch Bartholomeos as a friend. A priests’ school should be opened in Heybeliada."

Burns: "We … hope Turkey will help make its own case with the EU by allowing the Ecumenical Patriarch's religious school at Halki in Istanbul to reopen decades after it closed."

Editorial Note:
Burns is very specific as to which school should be re-opened, which has quite a different meaning than opening a school. Also, Burns ties this to Turkey’s EU

***

Hürriyet:
"Normalize relations with Armenia. The Turkish-Armenian border should be opened. We are opposed to the passing of the Armenian bill in Congress. In the case of this bill passing, those in Turkey who seek to keep a dialogue between the Armenians and the Turks will be silenced."

Burns:
"[T]he U.S. and Turkey face a serious challenge with regard to Armenia. Each year on April 24, Armenian Remembrance Day, President Bush has issued a public statement lamenting the mass killings and forced deportations of up to 1.5 million Armenians by Ottoman authorities at the end of World War I. … We believe passage of the U.S. House of Representative's Resolution 106, which would make a political determination that the tragedy of 1915 constituted genocide, would undercut voices emerging in Turkey for dialogue and reconciliations concerning these horrific events. We therefore have recommended to Congress that it not pass such a resolution. We strongly encourage Turkey to normalize its relations and reopen its border with Armenia, steps that will help bring peace, prosperity and cooperation to the Caucasus. Now, in the wake of the AKP's resounding electoral victories, is the time for Ankara to make a bold opening toward Armenia. And we hope that Armenia will respond in kind."

Editorial Note:
The phrase "will be silenced" has an ominous ring to it, as compared to what Burns actually said. Considering that Nationalist sympathizers silenced Armenian journalist Hrant Dink by shooting him dead outside the offices of his newspaper, Agos, this wording is not accidental.

***

Hürriyet: "Article 301 of the Turkish penal code, used even against Nobel prize-winner Orhan Pamuk, should be lifted."

Burns: [W]e hope Turkey will repeal Article 301 of the Penal Code, which restricts freedom of expression and has led to outlandish legal cases against private citizens and global figures such as Nobel Laureate Orhan Pamuk.

Editorial Note:
And why should it be lifted? For some reason, the editors at Hürriyet did not feel comfortable using the phrase "freedom of expression." Maybe they would have found themselves in violation of Article 301, somehow.

***

Hürriyet: "We are working for the UN to start a new venture in Cyprus."

Burns:
"We appreciate the difficulties that such cooperation poses for Turkey given the still-evolving Turkey-EU relationship, the circumstances of Turkey's participation in activities within the European Security and Defense Policy, as well as the complications resulting from the lack of a Cyprus settlement. Yet it is vital for all of us, including Turkey, that NATO and the EU are indeed able to work together in crisis areas around the world. For this and many other reasons, we call on all relevant parties to reinvigorate UN-brokered efforts to reach a comprehensive Cyprus settlement that reunifies the island into a bi-zonal, bi-communal federation. We welcome last week's meeting of President Papadopoulos and Mehmet Ali Talat, and look forward to future such meetings to implement last year's July 8 agreement."

Editorial Note: This bowdlerization of Burns’ remarks makes no sense – at least not to The Stiletto. Perhaps "new venture" is a code phrase that only Turks can understand.

The U.S. State Department Web site posted Burns’ speech, and hard copy was no doubt distributed to reporters covering the event. Hürriyet’s "version" of the speech cannot be chalked up to a poor translation. In a country where journalists can be prosecuted and jailed for insulting Islam or Turkishness, it is reasonable to assume a chilling effect that induces papers to report the news the government wants the people to know instead of the news the people need to know. Until Article 301 is repealed, Turkey will never be a Western-style democracy. In the long run, the U.S. does Turkey no favors by pretending otherwise.

Editorial Note: To reward Israeli president Shimon Peres for personally calling Abe Foxman to ensure that the Anti-Defamation League doesn’t let up in lobbying against the symbolic Congressional resolution recognizing the Armenian Genocide, Turkey provided Israel with intelligence on suspected Syrian nuclear facilities before a sortie into Syrian airspace by Israeli F-15I planes. Kuwaiti newspaper Al-Jarida reports that Turkish intelligence did not inform Erdogan of its plans. In an article no doubt meant to create the cover of plausible deniability for Erdogan, Hürriyet reported that an unnamed government official demanded to know whether the Israeli planes flew over Turkish airspace during the mission. Anyone who does not believe that Peres’ phone call and Turkey’s behind-the-scenes role in the Israeli raid is a quid pro quo is either naïve or not paying attention. Turkey will stop at nothing to guarantee that it will never be held accountable for the Armenian Genocide.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • September 19, 2007 Susan Somerville wrote:
    Stiletto - Very good job with pointing out how the Turks paint the picture, how Burns thinks he paints the picture, and what some of the discrepancies are.
    Did you see the article - either today or yesterday - about the lifting of the ban on headcoverings in Turkey? Erdogan is really showing his true colors, and the situation does not seem rosy.
    Hopefully, after Israel gets the upper hand in the region - if at all possible - then the recognition for occurred to masses of Armenians on the part of the Turks will come out in the open. Let's hope so!
    Reply to this
    1. September 20, 2007 The Stiletto wrote:
      Thanks! The Stiletto did, indeed, see the article on the headscarves - imagine they will rewrite the consititution for this. Turkey has always been duplicitous and as the Islamists and Nationalists pull the country more and more toward Islam (and away from the EU, which is demanding all sorts of "un-Turkish" societal and legal reforms), Israel will see their true colors. Remember, this is the same Turkey that claimed to be "neutral" in WWII but was in fact supplying Hitler's war machine with a scarce metal that was very much needed to keep the Luftwaffe in the air. That history alone should have made Israel turn its back on Turkey ...
      Reply to this
  • September 27, 2007 Qwerty the cucumber wrote:
    Oy veh! My family's combined taxable income is a good $3000 less than New York's aid package! Why don't WE get any aid, even if we do live in the Midwest?
    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.