THE OTHER SHOE DROPS: Updates To Previous Posts

Now Is Not The Time To Talk About Race: In a speech  to Justice Department employees about Black History Month Attorney General Eric Holder urged us all to use Black History Month to initiate frank dialogue about racial matters with one another, saying that the U.S. is “a nation of cowards” because “average Americans, simply do not talk enough with each other about things racial”:

 

“If we are to make progress in this area, we must feel comfortable enough with one another, and tolerant enough of each other to have frank conversations about the racial matters that continue to divide us. …

 

“To respect one another, we must have a basic understanding of one another. And so, we should use events such as this to not only learn more about the fact of black history, but also to learn more about each other.

 

“This will be, at first, a process that is both awkward and painful, but the rewards are, I believe, potentially great. The alternative is to allow to continue the polite, restrained mixing that now passes as meaningful interaction, but that in reality, accomplishes very little.

 

“Imagine, if you will, situations where people, regardless of their skin color, could confront racial issues freely and without fear.

 

How does Holder expect white Americans to feel "at ease" about race when they know that every Sunday black liberation preachers all over the country are spewing anti-white hatred; when blacks shun members of their race who are perceived to be "acting white" (last item); and when they are forced to attend "sensitivity" training that stereotypes and demeans them (second item). Whites should not to bear the burden alone for advancing racial tolerance and understanding. 

As it happens, within hours of Holder’s impolitic remarks on race relations, the New York Post published a tasteless cartoon playing off a tragedy involving a violent chimpanzee kept as a pet by an elderly CT woman that had to be put down by police after ripping off a neighbor’s hands and face. Some insisted the chimp was meant to depict President Barack Obama,
reports sister paper The Wall Street Journal:

 

The drawing, by frequent Post editorial cartoonist Sean Delonas, whose work appears in the paper's Page Six gossip column, depicts a police officer holding a smoking gun he apparently used to shoot a chimpanzee. The caption reads, "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill" [emphasis, The Stiletto]. …

 

Mr. Obama on Tuesday signed a nearly $800 billion economic stimulus package [emphasis, The Stiletto].

 

Monkeys have been used historically in pejorative portrayals of black people, and the New York Post cartoon immediately drew criticism, including from civil-rights activist Rev. Al Sharpton.

After a hue and cry went out across the land, The Post apologized – sorta – for the cartoon:  

 

Wednesday's Page Six cartoon - caricaturing Monday's police shooting of a chimpanzee in Connecticut - has created considerable controversy.

It shows two police officers standing over the chimp's body: "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill," one officer says.

It was meant to mock an ineptly written federal stimulus bill. 

Period. 

But it has been taken as something else - as a depiction of President Obama, as a thinly veiled expression of racism. 

This most certainly was not its intent; to those who were offended by the image, we apologize.

However, there are some in the media and in public life who have had differences with The Post in the past - and they see the incident as an opportunity for payback.

To them, no apology is due.

Sometimes a cartoon is just a cartoon - even as the opportunists seek to make it something else.

 

 

The cartoon is tasteless because the mad monkey’s victim suffered horrific injuries from which she can never recover – and she remains in critical condition fighting for her life. It’s to her and to her family that The Post should direct its apology.

 

But not to race-baiter Al Sharpton. While Obama signed the stimulus bill, he was widely criticized for not writing the bill, losing control of the process by leaving it to Nancy Pelosi & Co., who crafted it behind closed doors. The Post cartoon was drawing a parallel to “the infinite monkey theorem” - a monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely type a given text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare. Anyone who does not associate blacks and monkeys immediately understood that. To make the specious case the cartoon is racist one must deliberately substitute the word “sign” for “write” in the caption.

 

This is exactly the climate of fear Holder is referring to - and why no honest dialogue can occur if most people fear that they are one lame joke, dopey cartoon or misunderstood comment away from being labeled a racist.
 

 

Beg Your Pardon?: In the waning days of the Bush presidency, Dick Cheney made “a furious last-ditch effort to secure a pardon for his onetime chief of staff, I. Lewis Libby Jr.,” reports The New York Times:

 

 

The officials said Tuesday that Mr. Cheney’s lobbying campaign on behalf of Mr. Libby was far more intense than previously known, with the vice president bringing it up in countless one-on-one conversations with the president. They said Mr. Bush was unyielding to the end, already frustrated by a deluge of last-minute pardon requests from other quarters.

 

The dispute underscored the raw feelings of Mr. Cheney and other supporters of Mr. Libby, who believed that he was mistreated by prosecutors and ill served by a president who, in their view, failed to return Mr. Libby’s loyalty and sacrifice. 
 

Can The Nutrition Police Lay Off Coffee, Already?: New data from on the Nurses' Health Study of 83,076 women who had no history of stroke, heart disease, diabetes or cancer when they enrolled in 1980 suggests that women who drank four or more cups of coffee a day had a 20 percent lower risk of stroke, compared to women who had less than one cup per month and drinking two to three cups daily reduced risk by 19 percent, reports WebMD:

 

The benefits of coffee are much more significant for nonsmokers. For women who had never smoked or quit the habit, drinking four cups or more of coffee a day was associated with a 43% reduction in stroke risk. For women who smoked, drinking four cups or more was associated with only a 3% reduction in risk. …

 

In addition to smoking, having high blood pressure, diabetes, or high cholesterol also neutralized the coffee effect.

 

It wasn’t the caffeine, says the study’s lead author Esther Lopez-Garcia, because the protective effect was not observed amongst participants who drank tea and caffeinated soft drinks: “This finding supports the hypothesis that components in coffee other than caffeine may be responsible for the potential beneficial effect of coffee on stroke risk. Antioxidants in coffee lower inflammation and improve blood vessel function.”
 

Pierced Pussies For Sale On eBay: Wilkes-Barre, PA, dog groomer Holly Crawford' will be prosecuted on animal cruelty charges for selling "gothic kittens" with ear, neck and tail piercings, reports The Associated Press:

 

A prosecutor says Crawford inflicted pain on the cats, which were listed for sale for hundreds of dollars on the Internet. Crawford's attorney says state law says nothing about piercing cats or docking their tails.

 

At a preliminary hearing Tuesday, Wilkes-Barre District Judge Paul Hadzick called it a gray area that needs to be decided by a trial judge or jury.  

 

Boxers Or Thongs?: Joaquin Rico, 20, was sentenced to 12 years in prison after pleading to a convenience store robbery last May during which he and Joseph Richard Espinoza, 25, entered the store wearing thongs on their heads and Rico “grabbed the store's clerk by the neck and punched her in the face several times, breaking her jaw, reports The Associated Press.

Updates To Previous Posts (last item, All The Print Not Fit As News): Washington lobbyist Vicki Iseman has settled her $27 million defamation lawsuit against The New York Times and several of its reporters over a story that insinuated a romantic relationship between her and then-presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-AZ). The New York Times reports that the suit “was settled without payment and The Times did not retract the article. In an unusual agreement, however, The Times is letting Ms. Iseman’s lawyers give their views on the suit on the paper’s Web site. Their opinion is accompanied by a joint statement from both sides and a note to readers.”
 

Updates To Previous Posts (fourth item, Putting The Cart Before The Horse): While some students are mindlessly agitating to rename their schools after Barack Obama as a way of "honoring the steps we’ve made and how much more progressive our country has become now that he’s president" other students are applying analytical skills to critically evaluate his actions and policies. The East Valley Tribune (Mesa, AZ) reports on the reception the president got by students in Dobson High School’s Advanced Placement government class as he spoke in the school’s gymnasium about his mortgage bailout plan while they watched on TV:

 

Some of the students attentively watched the speech, giving questioning looks and comments, shaking their heads and laughing at some of Obama's words. Other students listened, occasionally glancing up to watch, while texting on their cell phones, reading a book or finishing school work. …

 

Senior Syna Daudfar took some notes during the speech and was among the most vocally opposed to Obama's words.

 

At one point, when he talked about the costs of his stimulus plan, senior Maaike Albach and Daudfar looked at each other and said, "uh-oh."

 

"Overall I think it's a good idea, but he's not addressing the issues of the economic crisis," said Daudfar, a John McCain supporter who added he leans more toward being a moderate conservative. "The spending bill he just passed is just progressing the Democratic agenda rather than addressing the economic issues in the country." …

 

Albach, who is also a Republican, said Obama's plan sounds good but questioned how Obama can want to rely on "people's responsibility" when that is "what got us in this economic crisis in the first place."

 

"This puts us more into debt," said Albach, 18. "It's a horrible situation we're in."

 

Editorial Note: In what may be a first, a liberal politician has been likened to Adolph Hitler on a T-shirt. Senior Brandon Miller, who briefly supported Obama "because of his speeches," sported a shirt with the words, "Hitler gave great speeches, too" above a picture of Obama. 

 

Updates To Previous Posts (last item, 10 Reasons Michelle Obama Should Be Proud – Really Proud – Of America): The latest installment in The Stiletto Blog’s ongoing series meant to help instill the necessary pride of country in Michelle Obama’s consciousness to enable her to serve as an unofficial ambassador. 

In 2006, then 9-year-old Aaron Ware lost his twin brother, Eric, to brain cancer. At the suggestion of his pediatrician Marilyn Corder the boy found solace in baking,
reports The Washington Post:

 

He started baking and selling cookies, with plans to give the proceeds to groups that helped his family when Eric was sick. …

 

Corder handed Aaron a $20 bill, making her the first investor in what he decided to call the Doughjangles baking company, playing off the name of the fast-food restaurant. Soon Aaron had backing from his parents, his godmother and an aunt. They equipped him with a black chef's jacket, cookie cutters, measuring cups and cookbooks. …

 

Aaron has made about $60 from cookie sales since the first batch went out about Thanksgiving. He has kept some for himself, invested some in baking supplies and donated the rest to organizations that helped the Wares when his brother was sick. …

 

The Casey Cares Foundation, based in Baltimore, sent the family to Hersheypark and to baseball games. Aaron's first check - for $10 - from the baking business went to Casey Cares.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • February 20, 2009 The Last Angry Man wrote:
    Well, according to the secularists, aren't we all monkeys?

    If we subscribe to evolution as they do, no one should be offended... unless that chimp was someone's ancestor.

    Reply to this
  • February 21, 2009 Rebecca A wrote:
    The cartoon was offensive to the woman who was hurt and her family, yes. But you are simply being obtuse not to recognize that it was also a racist jab at Obama.

    If Obama were a Republican, I'm sure you'd see this differently.
    Reply to this
    1. February 21, 2009 The Stiletto wrote:
      You have to change the wording of the caption of the cartoon to make this a racial jab against Obama - so it's the people who are claiming the cartoon is racist who are comparing Obama to a monkey and not The Post. 

      Also, the entire time this blog has been in existence, Bush was repeatedly drawn with simian features - to denote sub-humnan intelligence - and The Stiletto did not protest, even though she did not like it, because the cartoonists have First Amendment rights.So you're wrong about that, too.

      Reply to this
      1. February 22, 2009 Rebecca A wrote:
        Well, but Bush was not Black. White men with big ears have not historically been called apes or linked to apes, making this a very unfortunate miss, and I believe it really could be that both the cartoonist and paper were insensitive enough to miss it (although the latter is less believable in my book). And maybe you would not protest, but you would acknowledge the cartoon was aimed at him, as you just did. You are saying this cartoon, due to one word being "off," was not aimed at Obama. This is a stretch.

        I consider myself a bright person. I am successful, have a bunch of imagination, and a bunch of high grades and advanced degrees from a not-so-easy--to-get-into institution of higher learning. (And yes, I know a lot of dumb folks, at least as far as common sense goes, come from the same kind of background. I just don't feel that description pertains to me.) And I was stumped. How could you look at that cartoon and NOT see a racist jab at Obama, I wondered?

        I came here because I know how smart you are, and knew that if anyone could explain to me the thinking behind how that WASN'T a racist jab at Obama, you would be the one to do it.

        And you did not let me down. I now understand the defense's position. Thanks. (But I still think it is obtuse.)
        Reply to this
        1. February 22, 2009 The Stiletto wrote:
          No one can deny that racists have likened blacks to apes, and that the connotation is different when Bush is likened to a chimp - though the intent in both cases is to imply the target is sub-human. What bothers me is that you do need to change the caption of the cartoon in order to make the case that it is racist and that puts the lie to the accusation right there. I can apply the same technique to your comments - selectively and subtly change a word or two - and make you appear to be a raging racist. It would be unfair to you and dishonest of me - and a stretch.
          Reply to this
  • February 22, 2009 lemonfemale wrote:
    I have to admit that I thought the cartoonist intended the monkey to describe Obama, though after you parsed it out, I realized the "monkeys with typewriters" was what the cartoon intended. Of course, as my one daughter pointed out, it's probably a generational thing. I remember hearing it explained to me that the Negro physiognomy showed they were "one quarter step closer to the ape" than whites. Of course that's garbage but it was believed as self-evident fact by people who were not drunk, even by people who weren't all that hostile to Blacks, as long as they weren't marrying your sister or something. People much younger than I don't know that. I remember telling my co workers (early 20s) some of the provisions of Jim Crow and having one guy burst out "That's stupid!" Racism has been all but defeated in America in the only way any idea is defeated: by being no longer remembered.

    On the other hand,you're right that people ALWAYS drew Bush looking like a chimpanzee. There is no possible racist overtones to that as no-one except Muslim extremists are referring to any white person as an ape, but to use a specifically racial example, people apparently pelted Michael Steele with Oreos at one debate, and that, to a Black person, is an insult,while to a white person it's a snack. Unlike the chimpanzee, that was meant, not accidental. So if the cartoon was offensive, that would also be and I wonder what the position of those offended would be to the Oreos. Just asking.

    Reply to this
    1. February 22, 2009 The Stiletto wrote:
      You are right about the notion that blacks are one quarter step closer to apes than whites being a generational reference. The racist notion would eventually die out in the collective consciousness unless race-baiters keep it alive by reminding us of its existence. These days, it's not racists standing in the way of understanding and tolerance, it's race-baiters. But then, they have a lot to lose (their megaphones and their livelihoods) if we all just got along.
      Reply to this
    2. February 22, 2009 Rebecca A wrote:
      Your post reminds me of when I tried to read my kids a book about the little black kids who were the first to go to the desegregated elementary schools down South. It was black history month, and it was one of the books on the "suggested reading" list for that month. It was a little kids book in that it had pictures and short sentences, but it was really nasty to read about all those horrible people yelling at cute little girls while they tried to go in to their first and second grade classrooms. My son cut me off around page three. "I won't listen to this" he said. "This is just stupid and even if people did act so dumb I won't hear about it like this." I was so relieved. I began regretting it as soon as I started. My son came home with it from the library and said we were supposed to read it and, pretty dumb, I just glibly opened the book and started, figuring "hey, black history month is a good thing, right?" I just threw the darn book out and we never really mentioned it again.

      Reading a book like that to a 3rd grader aside, there is some place for the idea that we ought not to forget what happened in the past, so that we can be aware of it and not let it happen again. But I hate listening to Al Sharpton and the like just as much as the next person....

      Reply to this
      1. February 24, 2009 lemonfemale wrote:
        I think in third grade I would celebrate Black history month by concentrating on impressive Black people. Martin Luther King, WEB DuBois, Condoleeza Rice and so forth rather than racism. I would save that for kids somewhat older. Just like when one of my little kids got into one of my books on the Holocaust, I would divert them to some other book yet I had no objection to my 16 year old seeing the camp footage in JUDGEMENT AT NUREMBERG even though she wept in my arms after seeing that. I would teach racism in the sense of how much we have changed. I have recently read a little on American racism in history (WHEN HARLEM WAS IN VOGUE and INCIDENTS IN THE LIFE OF A SLAVE GIRL to name two) and, succinctly, I was appalled. I had no idea. We have come so very far...
        Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.