THE DAILY BLADE: Is Hasan A Crazy Terrorist, Or A Terrorist Crazy?

Perhaps recalling the brouhahah that erupted when he reflexively blamed police officer Sgt. James Crowley for the chain of events that culminated in the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr., President Barack Hussein Obama was loathe (video) to blame homegrown Islamic terrorism for the apparently premeditated bloodbath allegedly perpetrated by Muslim-American soldier Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan to homegrown Islamic terrorism in a Rose Garden statement the next morning: “We don't know all the answers yet. And I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts.”

The Washington Post
notes that in his weekly radio address on Saturday, Obama “convicted” Hasan of murder, having forgotten to use the qualifiers “suspected” or “alleged”:

 

This past Thursday, on a clear Texas afternoon, an Army psychiatrist walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center, and began shooting his fellow soldiers.

But by then, Obama knew more about Hasan than he knew about Crowley when he jumped feet-first into the white cop-black arrestee dispute - yet, he refused to raise the possibility that this could have been an act of jihad. The media had already reported that Hasan:


Was "devout, prayed at daily at the mosque and wore traditional Muslim dress when off duty;

Was deeply conflicted by his religion and noted that the Koran instructs Muslims not to form alliances with Jews or Christians;

 

Had worshipped at a mosque in 2001 that was led by radical imam Anwar al-Awlaki, believed to be a "spiritual adviser" to three of the Sept 11, 2001 hijackers – and may have met two of them;

 

Joined an Islamic matchmaking service looking for a wife who wore the hijab and prayed five times a day;

 

Had given away his possessions over the preceding several days;

 

Openly voiced his opposition to the anti-terror wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in terms that were described as anti-American propaganda, and had also made anti-Semitic comments;

 

Is believed to have posted comments on the Internet sympathetic to homicide bombers – allegedly comparing them to soldiers who fall on grenades to save comrades; and

 

Is reported by eye-witnesses to have shouted “Allahu akbar!” (“God is great!”) before “calmly” killing 13 people and wounding 38 others.

 

"We don't know all the answers yet,” said Obama, “and I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts.”

 

And now we have learned that the army was tipped off by U.S. intelligence months ago that Hasan was trying to E-mail al Qaeda associates. Not wanting to jump to any conclusions, until FBI and military investigators confirm what our post-9/11 gut instinct tells us is the probable motive for yet another Mulslim to act out his outrage in a murderous rampage against Infidels (that is to say, Christians and Jews), let’s all just play along and pretend we really don’t know “why” Hasan did it.

 

Unfortunately, The WaPo doesn’t want to play by Obama’s rules and has already jumped to the conclusion that “the terrible crime of which Maj. Hasan is accused was not the expression of any faith, nor the work of a terrorist organization, but rather, it appears, the act of an evil or deranged individual.”

 

“It's hard to draw too many conclusions right now,” writes Newsweek’s Andrew Bast, but then he, too, jumps to a conclusion: “[T]he U.S. military could well be reaching a breaking point as the president decides to send more troops into Afghanistan … soldiers and their families are living, and bending, under a harrowing and unrelenting stress that will not let up any time soon … it isn't much of a leap to argue that to further tax our military would do as much as anything to guarantee that the homegrown terror on display today could well repeat itself in the future.”

 

For his part, New York Post columnist Ralph Peters does not want to play this game, and contends that “[p]olitical correctness killed those patriotic Americans at Fort Hood as surely as the Islamist gunman did”: 

 

[N]o officer in his chain of command, either at Walter Reed Army Medical Center or at Fort Hood, had the guts to take meaningful action against a dysfunctional soldier and an incompetent doctor. …  

 

[O]fficers fear charges of discrimination when faced with misconduct among protected minorities. …

 

The chain of command protected a budding terrorist who was waving one red flag after another. Because it was safer for careers than doing something about him. …

 

But when do we, the American public, knock off the PC nonsense?

 

As psychoanalyst Ken Eisold notes on PsychologyToday.com, “[s]truggling as we all are to make sense of this tragic incident, none of us can help bringing our own perspectives to bear on it”:

 

[L]iberals tend to see this as an act of individual madness, which is how the right tends to think of liberals: always explaining away such actions, blinding themselves to the real dangers of conspiracy. …

 

The right, on the other hand, usually committed to the rights on individuals, sees no individuals at all in this scenario. A Muslim is a Muslim and a likely terrorist. They know what they know.

 

Well, here’s what one of columnist Rod Dreher’s neighbors knows: “Her soldier son worked with Hasan on the base back East. She said he described Hasan as unfriendly, a loner. And she said, ‘He told me there's no way Hasan is crazy. He knew what he was doing.’”

 

Oh, and one more thing: While it’s true that non-Muslim soldiers have also turned on and killed their brothers in arms and that military counselors and chaplains are under emotional strain themselves, it doesn’t necessarily follow that Hasan merely snapped and was not a jihadi. With his sworn duty to his country increasingly at odds with his perceived duty to Islam, the likeliest scenario is that he was both mentally unstable and a jihadi.

Editorial Note: Hasan
murdered 14 people last week, not 13. Pvt. Francheska Velez, 21, was nine weeks pregnant with her first child. The Unborn Victims of Violence Act counts "the death of, or bodily injury to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place" as a separate criminal act.

 

The Yankees Win! Thuuuuuuuh Yankees Win!


Now that the 2009 season is in the history books, The Stiletto has been walking around her home aimlessly for the past few days trying to remember how she used to fill the four-hour chunks of time she’s been spending watching baseball over the last six months.

Not only it was an exciting series – both teams lived up to their reputations for late-inning rallies - the Yankees 27th World Series title is historic for a number of reasons (other than the obvious one):

The Yankees hadn’t won a championship since Hillary Clinton declared herself a fan of the team and was elected and NY’s junior senator (video). President Barack Hussein Obama did NYers a huge favor by getting her to relocate to Washington, D.C. when she couldn’t get there on her own because - the proof is irrefutable now - she was our goat. 

 

The Yankees inaugurated their then-new stadium by winning the World Series in six games in 1923, and repeated this feat again in their new home across the street.

 

This is now the 52nd year that there has not been a game 7 at Yankee Stadium, reports MLB.com: “[T]he last time it happened ... gasoline was 24 cents a gallon, a first-class stamp cost three cents and ‘Leave it to Beaver’ ruled the Nielsen households. The year was 1957.”

 

In game 6 Hideki Matsui hit a two-run homer off Pedro Martinez in the second inning, a two-run single in the third and a two-run double in the fifth, which earned him the honor of becoming the first designated hitter to be named MVP. And Alex Rodriguez became a World Series champion for the first time.

 

The ratings for this World Series were the highest since 2004, reports MediaWeek: “With an average delivery of 19.4 million viewers, the six-game series outdrew last year’s Rays-Phillies set by 38 percent, per Nielsen ratings data. … The most watched contest of this year’s series was Game 4, which drew 22.8 million viewers.” Game 4, you’ll recall, was the one in which Johnny Damon stole second and third on Brad Lidge's first pitch to Mark Teixeira.

 

The 2009 season saw future Hall-of-Famer Derek Jeter break the Yankees' hit record held by Lou Gehrig for more than 70 years back in September; the Bronx Bombers sweep the Boston Red Sox to clinch the American League East title; and more games won in the 9th inning than any other major league team (including game 4 of the World Series).

 

Aside from bobbled balls and runners getting hung between bases, there were also these classic bloopers:

 

In a sort of reverse “it ain’t over till it’s over” moment, when the Yankees held a 3-1 lead in the championship Macy’s prematurely ran an ad in the Philadelphia Inquirer congratulating the Phillies on winning back-to-back World Series titles:

In the first inning of Game 3, A-Rod put a finger to his nose and snorted out a snot rocket, which is an entire order of magnitude more yucky than all the spitting that goes on.

Nonetheless, The Stiletto is counting the days until Monday, April 5th, when the Yanks play the Red Sox on opening day of the 2010 season.

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
Page: 1 of 1
  • November 11, 2009 lemonfemale wrote:
    I'm not sure where the one writer is going by saying liberals see Hasan as insane and conservatves see him as Muslim and therefore a terrorist. The possibility that someone might see him as a particular brand of Muslim: the kind who are impelled to terrorist acts by their religion while seeing other Muslims as entirely decent people is not provided for. I believe Hasan killed for his religion, and if I were trapped in an elevator with any ten other Muslims, I would not worry about a one (barring their drawing a gun and yelling "Allahu Akbar!") of course.

    I happened to see Dr. Phil on Larry King and he said the man had "mental issues" but I don't buy it. Some people believe Hasan is insane because they define insane as anyone doing what he did. They are medicalizing crime. Was Hitler insane? Was Eichmann? "He is sane," said the psychiatrist who determined him fit to stand trial, "more so than I am because I had to examine him." It is past time we discussed the elephant in the room, that being homegrown solo Islamofacist terrorists. They are coming. They are here.

    Reply to this

Page: 1 of 1
Leave a comment

Submitted comments are subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Name (required)

 Email (will not be published) (required)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.